Am 13.03.2012 10:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte<
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
statements. Your assumption is that we have to sacrifice neutrality to
please a audience that doesn't want to see that it is looking for... Great
start!
Neutrality is following what our sources do.
ยน Depends on:
* the definition of "sources"
* the neutrality of the sources itself
* the context of "do" in respect to "clould do"/"might do"/"supposed
to do"/...
* the target audience ("to entertain" vs "to educate" themself)
All we said was: Every content has to be treated as equal.
That is a fringe position in the real world.
That is the encyclopedic viewpoint of the world. Even so it might not be
achievable, it is the aim.
nya~ (said the cat leaning at window)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
