On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Fae <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Strangely enough, searching Commons for "Male figure" rather than >> "Male human" shows me artwork from the National Museum of African Art >> and a Michelangelo Buonarroti sketch from the Louvre in top matches. >> No problem with wading through "100 dicks and arseholes". In fact, >> carefully checking through the first 100 matches of that search gave >> me no explicit photographs of naked people or their private parts at >> all. >> >> > > Just a second here – this search > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=250&offset=20&redirs=0&profile=images&search=male+human > > doesn't give you any "explicit photographs of naked people or their private > parts at all" in the first 100 matches? Really? > > The 1st image is a close-up of a urinating penis. The 5th image is a close-up > of a penis. The 8th, 9th and 11th image are close-ups of penises, one of them > erect, and one with a hand grabbing the scrotum. The 13th image is a close-up > of an arsehole. The 14th image a close-up of a scrotum. The 15th, 17th, 18th, > and 19th are images of erect penises. And so on. I haven't mentioned any of > the other nude images. > > Andreas > > I think I misread Fae, who was probably referring to his search for "male figure" when he said he did not have a problem having to wade through sexual images. Apologies. :) Andreas _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
