On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > <cimonav...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> Whew. We as a community figured that it would be insuperable from >> the get go, about 9 years ago. And Jimbo duely banned the first >> proposers. Glat to know the board is up to date, only 9 years late. >> > > "We as a community" don't agree on very much, and the image filter and > related issues certainly have a lot of people on all sides. So if you could > just speak for yourself, I don't know what the rest of the community would > think, but I'd appreciate it.
This is just so wrong. There neve was ideas on this "from all sides". What there was to begin with, were very ham-handed attemps to try on maklng wikipedia more "family friendly". Once those were soundly spanked, as they needed to be; we got more sophisticated approaches that amounted to the same. And again the community -- not me -- rose up as one man and said a thorough *NO!!!* to the whole thing. Please don't try to personalize something where the minority is trying to lead the majority astray... -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
