On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > The article feedback tool has nothing to do with approving edits, though. > Lets roll the conversation back; can you succinctly tell me how you > perceive the Article Feedback Tool, or what you know about it? That way > I'll know where you're coming from, and if there are any misunderstandings > which would explain why we're talking at cross-threads. >
I freely admit I was being a bit flippant. But that was just because I knew I was in the right. Let us put it this succintly: "Being passive aggressive rather than aggressive about the way things are allowed as valid contributions to the encyclopaedia, is worse than being up front about it". Is that succint enough for you? -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
