> > We're an educational resource concerned with the diffusion of > knowledge. They are primary researchers that will publish their data > and conclusion with an open license, thus adding to the "sum of all > knowledge". I think those objectives are eminently compatible. >
Which is a reasonable response; and I'd probably agree with you. Although it does lead to another question; a lot of studies are conducted around the world, many of them would benefit dramatically from publicity on a "top-5" website. How far does supporting those that ask go? What sort of precedent does it set? Were Berkman given preference here for some as-yet-unknown reason (as is being suggested). The latter point could be fairly damaging to our credibility. Again; issues that should really be worked out in advance? Tom _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
