On 29 November 2011 12:03, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> What i found to be the best solution so far was the "blurred images > filter". You can 'opt-in' to enable it and all images will be blurred as > the default. Since they are only blurred you will get a rough impression > on what to expect (something the what a hidden image can't do) and an > blurred image can be viewed by just hovering the mouse cursor over it. > While you browse, not a single click is needed. On top of that it is > awfully easy to implement, we already have a running version of it (see > brainstorming page), it doesn't feed any information to actual censors > and it is in no way a violation with NPOV. So far i didn't hear any > constructive critic why this wouldn't be a very good solution. I gave one before: >From the far side of the office, a blurred penis on your screen looks like a blurred penis on your screen. For this reason, I suggest a blank grey square instead. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
