On 10 October 2011 20:03, Kim Bruning <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 08:49:13PM -0400, Risker wrote: > > No, I can't arrange a demonstration, Kim. I do not have net nannies on > any > > system that I control. The systems on which I have encountered them are > not > > publicly accessible. They have prevented access to all articles I tested > > within a given category on English Wikipedia and all images within a > given > > category that I tested on Commons. > > That sounds like it works on the basis of keywords, perhaps. > > How thoroughly have you tested it, when did you do this test? > > Can we check? > > Can it block those images from the given category on commons, if > viewed on the actual pages they are used for on wikipedia? > > And will it also block images from the subcategory - if used on wikipedia? > > I might investigate or even buy this software (if not exceptionally > expensive) and test it extensively if this is the case. > > sincerely, > Kim Bruning > > I cannot answer your questions, Kim, as these are generally systems in which I do not have longterm access; and those that I do have longterm access, I'm not going to risk my accounts for your experiments. I cannot think of a legitimate reason why I would be investing a large amount of time checking all the articles in [[:Category:Sexual positions]] (or the equivalent Commons category) on those accounts, for example. You may be in a different situation. Risker _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
