Hello Fae, thank you very much for pointing this out. Yes, I think you indeed hit the nail. We discussed this problem on our meeting and Sue provided some plans on how to work on this problem. I am normally reluctant to comment what the staff is doing or what they are planning to do, because this often can be seen as an intervening of the staff activity. But I think it is ok for me to spoil this a bit now: So Sue suggests a two step approach. In the first step we will only collect reader reactions on images, to see if there is a problem at all, how big is the problem, and where are the problems. And on a second step, when we have those data and can work out an understanding of it, then we can go on to work out dedicated solutions for the problems, as I said in my letter, together with the community.
Greetings Ting On 09.10.2011 23:55, wrote Fae: > Hi Ting, > > Thanks for explaining the position of the board in your own words. I > appreciate the board is listening. I am concerned that you state that > the board is acting from "belief", I recommend you consider how this > can move to proposing a strategy based on facts and non-controversial > analysis. > > I suspect that any proposal for change will be strongly resisted and > continue to divide our community until well understood and well > communicated facts underpin the board's resolution rather than > personal belief. > > Cheers, > Fae > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l -- Ting Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
