Am 09.10.2011 16:56, schrieb Thomas Dalton: > On 9 October 2011 15:12, Ting Chen <wing.phil...@gmx.de> wrote: >> the text of the May resolution to this question is "... and that the >> feature be visible, clear and usable on all Wikimedia projects for both >> logged-in and logged-out readers", and on the current board meeting we >> decided to not ammend the original resolution. > > So you do intend to force this on projects that don't want it? Do you > really think that's going to work? If the WMF picks a fight with the > community on something the community feel very strongly about (which > this certainly seems to be), the WMF will lose horribly and the > fall-out for the whole movement will be very bad indeed.
hi Thomas, I would say, it is a perfect example of one of the Parkinsons law. They did´nt diskuss how it may work and how many man-hour it will need to achieve the escape of maybe hundreds of today hard working editors. And how much money it will really need. Because, implementing this software is just a fractional amount of overall costs. “The time spent on any item of the agenda will be in inverse proportion to the sum involved.” Because the wars in Commons, which Categories at least will fit violence, will be unmanageable. I don´t want to confront myself with fundamental christian groups in categorising cruzification and holy cross as to become a to be hidden category because of atrocious violence or not. Hubertl. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
