On 22 September 2011 12:19, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So is there a simpler way to do this, is there some flaw in this that would > prevent it working, or is this the flying unicorn option? I believe it was envisioned as working for anonymous casual readers as well. There *should* be some way to at least have the no-images option for anonymous readers without ruining caching ... - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
