On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 13:45, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:50, Tobias Oelgarte >> <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Am 16.09.2011 12:42, schrieb Milos Rancic: >>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:39, emijrp<emi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I think that we can do a nice move here. We can enable image filter in >>>>> German Wikipedia for all those who don't want to see >>>>> copyrighted-images-for-German-law, meanwhile allowing other people to see >>>>> all Commons splendour. Using the image filter to improve the rights of >>>>> readers of German Wikipedia. Very cool, right? ; ) >>>> Oh, you found the first useful purpose of the image filter! >>> He did not. Optionally hiding of the image wouldn't make it legal. The >>> filter has nothing to do with this case. >> >> Then, make it opt-out :P >> > ¨ > And what if the English Wikipedia chooses to opt out?
It's about implementing image filter on images which have copyright problems in Germany (but not in US), not about nudity. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
