Am 16.09.2011 10:40, schrieb Peter Gervai: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:08, Tobias Oelgarte > <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> A strong majority of 86% percent voted to not allow the personal image >> filter [2] , despite the fact that the board already decided to >> introduce the feature. > I believe it is a fair assumption that we have voted for developing > the feature, so wikipedias who need it can activate and use it, while > those who do not want to use it will not request its activation, or > will request its deactivation. I see no technical reason not to do > that so I see no reason not to do it this way. > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > It weren't just a poll. It was also a discussion in search for arguments. One big issue is question on how we decide what is or might be objectionable. From the point of an encyclopedia nothing is objectionable, as long it is a fact and represented that way.
Another issue is the questioning in comparison to the referendum. The referendum showed that the global community is divided. But more then 2 weeks after the referendum we still have no results per project. This makes it impossible compare both polls and come to a conclusion what the reasons for the different outcome is: Where it just the (manipulative) questions of the referendum or does the German play a very different role in global context. Something we can answer. I asked for this results multiple times. But still no reaction whatsoever. This sucks. Tobias _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
