Hoi,
So you understand what a macro language is. Why the kicking then ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 12 July 2011 10:59, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:03, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Macro languages are nicely defined. They are languages that used to be
> > recognised at one time as a single language but are found to be a
> > combination of multiple languages. Kicking the idea of macro-languages is
> > daft; it is not only a result of the work of SIL it is more the
> consequence
> > of the work of the maintainers of the iso-639-1 and the iso-639-3.
>
> If you've read definition at SIL [1], you would know that it is just
> the first paragraph of the definition.
>
> [1] http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
