On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:03, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Macro languages are nicely defined. They are languages that used to be > recognised at one time as a single language but are found to be a > combination of multiple languages. Kicking the idea of macro-languages is > daft; it is not only a result of the work of SIL it is more the consequence > of the work of the maintainers of the iso-639-1 and the iso-639-3.
If you've read definition at SIL [1], you would know that it is just the first paragraph of the definition. [1] http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
