2011/2/19 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>: > On 19 February 2011 10:31, Teofilo <teofilow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A) Internationalisation. The CC 3.0 license is an "unported" license. >> This means English-based, English speaking countries' jurisdictions >> bases, English Common Law based. The 3.0 version is a disappointing >> regression from the better 2.0 version. >> In contrast, the CC 2.0 licenses have country (and/or language) based >> versions such as : >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ca/legalcode.fr >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ca/legalcode.en >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/au/legalcode >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/legalcode >> and so on. > > > You do not understand the licenses. There are also country versions of > 3.0, and each is explicitly interchangeable with each of the others.
3.0 is not as thoroughly internationalized as 2.0. Click on the following links so that you can see by yourself that they are empty : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ca/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/fr/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ja/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/in/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ru/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
