I forgot to tell two important pluralistic principles that are endangered by the upload wizard project :
A) Internationalisation. The CC 3.0 license is an "unported" license. This means English-based, English speaking countries' jurisdictions bases, English Common Law based. The 3.0 version is a disappointing regression from the better 2.0 version. In contrast, the CC 2.0 licenses have country (and/or language) based versions such as : http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ca/legalcode.fr http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ca/legalcode.en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/au/legalcode http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/legalcode and so on. B) At present, the possibility to use different upload forms in each language is the accepted policy on Wikimedia Commons : "You don't need to have all of the "versions" or options that the English version has. Choose what is appropriate for speakers of your language, considering their likely background in Wikimedia. Talk to other users at your language Village Pump." : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Redesigning_the_upload_form#Updating_the_form_for_your_language _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
