Jon, That must be a new change about [email protected], as the email didn't work as of a few weeks ago. I wasn't aware of that.
However, from a policy perspective, we've always screened the email first at [email protected] before sending it on to the GC. So in fact, that would still be the better place for it to go. -Dan On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Jon Davis wrote: > I've been taking care of these aliases, so to be clear: * > [email protected] is a good and valid address to use*. It is an alias > that goes to the correct person(s), being our interim legal council. When > we get a new full time council, the alias will be repointed to them. So > [email protected] will always be a good and safe bet. > > -Jon > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:28, Dan Rosenthal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That email is incorrect. >> >> The direct email is [email protected]. >> >> As far as I know, simply [email protected] forwards to >> [email protected] or some other email address; either way, not where it >> needs to go. >> >> -Dan >> On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Huib Laurens wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> As far as I know: [email protected] >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Huib >>> _______________________________________________ >>> foundation-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > > > > -- > Jon Davis > Office IT System & Network Administrator > Wikimedia Foundation > 415-839-6885 > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
