On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Michael Snow <wikipe...@frontier.com> wrote: > On 10/24/2010 4:12 PM, John Vandenberg wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Pharos<pharosofalexand...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Perhaps an alternative strategy could be to hold a grand round-robin >>> vote to launch one new project per year, at least in beta phase. >>> >>> This might ensure that the very best ideas get through and are >>> actualized, without quite opening the floodgates. >> I like the idea of one 'beta' per year. >> >> Before starting these betas, we should have a rough process for how we >> decide when to kill an unsuccessful beta. An RFC on meta? > > Should the parallel processes require comparable levels of agreement for > starting or shutting down a project? That would seem fair.
I'm not following you. Are you referring to existing processes for starting/killing projects/subdomains? Could you expand/rephrase? -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
