On 10/24/2010 4:12 PM, John Vandenberg wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Pharos<pharosofalexand...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Perhaps an alternative strategy could be to hold a grand round-robin >> vote to launch one new project per year, at least in beta phase. >> >> This might ensure that the very best ideas get through and are >> actualized, without quite opening the floodgates. > I like the idea of one 'beta' per year. > > Before starting these betas, we should have a rough process for how we > decide when to kill an unsuccessful beta. An RFC on meta? Should the parallel processes require comparable levels of agreement for starting or shutting down a project? That would seem fair.
--Michael Snow _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
