Nice summary/overview... > 10% news/events/media coverage > 10% pointless digressions > 10% snarky comments > 10% trolling > 10% uncritical discussion of WMF > 50% sharp criticism
I wonder what percentage of the sharp criticism gets dealt with? Would it make sense to keep track of that statistic? Using this breakdown as a metric, it seems likely to be a significant of value! _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
