I don't think we're in danger of outlawing sharp criticism on Foundation-l. If I had to give a guesstimate of the content breakdown of Foundation-l traffic, it would look something like:
10% news/events/media coverage 10% pointless digressions 10% snarky comments 10% trolling 10% uncritical discussion of WMF 50% sharp criticism Ryan Kaldari On 10/18/10 11:56 AM, Fred Bauder wrote: >> Funny how Peter's blog complaining about moderation is itself moderated >> by Peter. >> >> Ryan Kaldari >> > That is not significant. The kind of stuff random vandals post has to be > moderated. The question is whether sharp criticism is approved for > posting. > > Fred > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
