On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:08 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: The Right Honourable Mr Godwin:
>>In the world outside this mailing list, the fact that I'm responding to this >>extent to these criticisms would itself be taken as proof of transparency, >>not disproof. > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Well yes, but after the fact. If I'm reading the criticism correctly the > point being made is that within the process > there might be some room for *including* the community in these actions... Personally I'm in favour of a strong legal lead to protect the community. If there's a debate to be had, I'd rather see action taken and then the discussion had afterwards as to whether we have a strong community feeling for those things to then be replaced. To do it the other way, by community consensus *first*... well, the overwhelming majority are not lawyers and even fewer will be cognisant of the laws pertaining to copyright or other issues that hit Wikipedia. So I trust Mike Godwin to protect us all and *then* be challenged on his actions whilst, in the interim, we lose the content under discussion. User:Bodnotbod _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
