-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Godwin <mnemo...@gmail.com>
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 2, 2010 4:54 pm
Subject: [Foundation-l] Office action
>> It is a shame that WMF hasn't a policy of TRANSPARENCY regarding
>> office actions. The right of the community to get all information
>> cannot be overruled by Mr. Godwin's personal opinions about secret
>> things.
>>
>In the world outside this mailing list, the fact that I'm responding to this
>extent to these criticisms would itself be taken as proof of transparency,
>not disproof.
----------------------------------------------------
Well yes, but after the fact. If I'm reading the criticism correctly the point
being made is that within the process
there might be some room for *including* the community in these actions, or at
the very least replacing the deleted pages
with an explanation of what occurred and how to *fix* it. We've seen that
here, you helpfully described what a person
should do if they object to the deletion. But is that information on the
deleted pages themselves?
What harm do you foresee in replacing deleted pages with a declaration like
YouTube uses, "This Video has been deleted
based on a copyright claim by The Disney Corporation" ? And then an extension
of "If you believe this is public domain material
then restore the page and include this disclaimer blah blah blah"
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
