Jay Walsh <jwa...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > We've seen a lot of comments about the size of the puzzle globe, and I don't > >disagree that it might benefit from being increased in size slightly.
And shrinking makes the puzzle pieces - the cornerstone of the original winning design - ambiguous. How ambiguous? For example in a competitor's logo, a potato shape with the same aforementioned puzzle pieces combine optically to create the impression of a human brain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Uncyclopedia.png Seriously. The classic logo clearly deliniated the puzzle pieces with strong lines. The current appears to overemphasize the shadow in the back of the sphere - making the "3-D" sphere look in fact flat and a bit non-spherical /warped. -SC _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
