http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DragonHawk/2010_logo#Comparison That's the clearest demonstration of the difference in size. New and Old compared. Both images are 250pixels wide. They should be basically equal, but are not.
Those 2 images also clearly show the difference in detail, and why people are calling the new logo "flat", and the middle-line "too distinct". The "unbalanced" problem, is possibly due to the location of the individual glyphs within each separate puzzle piece. Previously, the glyphs were more in line with each other (the glyphs were almost parallel horizontally, if the globe was rotated to be straight). The new logo changes that, and places the glyphs in a distinct zigzag, up and down, around each horizontal band. This "unbalance" however is something that we might just need to get used to. A rotating animation might make it clearer what the intention is. The size and flatness however are severe problems. Hope that helps. Quiddity On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jay Walsh <jwa...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Thanks, Lodewijk > > We've seen a lot of comments about the size of the puzzle globe, and I don't > disagree that it might benefit from being increased in size slightly. I feel > this might also affect the overall contrast and definition. The whole > usability team is collecting feedback on this, and part of that is the > overall shape and size of the identity. > > Thanks > jay > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
