On 11 May 2010 04:15, Mike Godwin <mnemo...@gmail.com> wrote: > BBC got the story from Fox. There would have been a Fox story regardless, > and I wouldn't assume that BBC would not have picked up the more > sensationalistic story that Fox was hoping to run.
The BBC heard about the story from Fox. They then went and did their own research and produced a factually accurate article. It's not a good article for us because the facts are bad - infighting always is. Had Jimmy done nothing, the BBC may still have picked up the Fox story but they would have still done their own research and produced a factually accurate article. In that case, the facts would have been reasonably good (most people are in favour of NOT:CENSORED) and we would have ended up with a good article for us. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
