On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Mike Godwin <mnemo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Can you point me to major media entities.... > > --Mike > > well for a slightly more entertaining news version you could see : http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/05/child-pornography-at-the-center-of-intra-wikipedia-warfare.html <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/05/child-pornography-at-the-center-of-intra-wikipedia-warfare.html>I particularly liked "Sanger took his case<http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/27/wikipedia-child-porn-larry-sanger-fbi/> to Fox News, a sort of people’s encyclopedia of dispassionate cynicism" well then again this is the same group that wrote http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/04/whats-the-point-of-having-a-source-if-youre-just-going-to-pretend-it-says-something-else-wikipedia-editors-and-justin-bieber-fans-battle-for-control-of-justin-bieber-wikipedia-page.html where it decided that it had to put [sic] on “added move [sic] protection.” since obviously we meant more (yes they did indeed add move protection). James Alexander james.alexan...@rochester.edu jameso...@gmail.com 100 gmail invites and no one to give them to :( let me know if you want one :) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
