2010/1/13 private musings <thepmacco...@gmail.com>: > G'day all, > I continue to have concerns related to the growing number of explicit images > on WMF projects (largely commons) - but rather than banging on with dull > mailing list posts which gaurantee a chorus of groans, I'm trying to be a > bit less dull, and have made a short video presentation. > It's my intention to work on this with a few like minded wiki volunteers, > and probably then make a sort of alternate version for youtube etc. to see > what the general feeling is out there.... what I'd really like is for the > foundation to acknowledge that this is an issue where some regulation may be > necessary (or indeed, where the discussion of potential benefits of some > regulation is even conceivable) - I hope the board, or the advisory board, > might also be interested in offering some thoughts / recommendations too. > I've used a selection of explicit images from Commons, so please only click > through if you're over the age of majority; > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Privatemusings/WikiPr0n > ps. I'm also particularly interested if anyone can point me to where > 'section 2257' (record keeping) issues may have previously been discussed - > is it the current foundation position that section 230 acts as an exemption > to these requirements?
Come on, even *I* would have given up on this argument by now... you're not going to win... If you think there are legal concerns, email Mike Godwin. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l