Hoi, The things that go wrong are not necessarily the same things that go wrong. Yes things go wrong.. There are more things that could and should have gone differently... Nobody heard the Wikivoices interviews with many of the candidates for instance. Sadly it did not materialise but it could have made a difference for many voters. I participated because of the potential of it.
Yes, the mails went out late and extra work will be needed to weed out the bots BUT when more people voted as a result, when everyone was approached who was eligible to vote it has been a good thing. To the people who considered the invitation to vote SPAM, I have one message, you can opt out and if that is not good enough, tough. Thanks, GerardM 2009/8/9 Al Tally <majorly.w...@googlemail.com> > Maybe this is related? > > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Forum#Unable_to_vote_in_trustees_election > > I don't want to seem rude, as I'm sure it's difficult and I understand the > election committee are volunteers, but why is it that things seem to be > going wrong this year? > > -- > Alex > (User:Majorly) > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l