fair enough, Pedro - I certainly don't want any weight, in terms of argument, placed on my opinion that this matters - I'd much rather stick to the substantive issues of the matter at hand.... it's more about discussing wether or not it's a problem that wmf hosts pic.s of topless chicks on the beach without their permssion.. and other assorted problems with explicit sexual images being easily accessible on wmf projects.
cheers, Peter PM. On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:06 PM, private musings <thepmacco...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Re : Pedro - heh... I take your point - doesn't mean we shouldn't talk > > about > > the merits of the point at hand, though, no? If there's an improvement to > > be > > made, that's gonna be a good thing regardless of the opinion that it's > also > > important, I reckon.... > > > > cheers, > > > > Peter > > > > No, it doesn't meanthat. > It means, if you're going to play the "the future of wikipedia is at stake" > then you better backup your hand with arguments and evidence > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
