Thomas Dalton wrote: > Flagged Revs is an excellent way of dealing with vandalism to BLPs, > technical solutions to more subtle problems are a little trickier. > Flagged Revs could be used with addition levels - a "free of > vandalism" level and a "well balanced, fact-checked and free of > anything remotely libellous" level. Two separate levels are necessary > since the 2nd takes far too long to be a practical vandal fighting > tool - I'm not sure which level would be shown by default to whom, > that needs to be worked out. > I very much agree, but given the difficulty of implementing flags that deal only with blatant vandalism, I feel despair at trying to go further. > Tagging with templates is our usual method, but it isn't particularly > effective. Perhaps we need to be a little more demanding about getting > things fixed. It's easier to add a tag than to fix what it's trying to point out. Piling up tasks for other people to do is bound to create backlogs.
Ec _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
