> >> The torturous logic can't > >> disguise that the license has been GFDL from the git-go > >> and is not departing from that license against the prime > >> guardian of that license. That is the bare fact. > >> > > > > > > Huh? > > > > See my above reply.
See mine. I was speaking here with regard to the legal aspect of the license change, not with regard to what I find acceptable or unacceptable. Yes, the FSF has consented to this change (and shame on them for that), but the fact that they are only willing to do so under such convoluted terms has negative implications on the legal defensibility of it. That said, it also speaks to the fact that even the FSF doesn't find this change to be wholly acceptable. They're not even willing to eat their own dogfood. Hell, they've gone through much trouble to ensure that virtually no one except Wikipedia contributors has to eat it. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
