2009/2/9 Delirium <delir...@hackish.org>: > At the very least, it seems to empirically not be a problem. The GPL has > included the "or later" language since it was first published in 1989, > and has since gone through two updates (the first in 1991), without, as > far as I can find, a single ruling invalidating that language. And > GPL-licensed stuff has *much* more extensive worldwide commercial reuse > than Wikimedia content does.
Indeed. It defies rationality to assert that there is a first-world country where "or later" is an insuperable barrier. If you want me to consider it one, I'd like to see an actual case please. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
