Brian wrote: > Is this intended to imply that this full attribution must be on the same > medium? > > Heavens forfend.
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com > >> wrote: >> > > >> Full attributions are often the only guarantee of clear >> ability to reuse. That is a fact. It would be arduous to >> clarify where it might not be. I am satisfied the lawyers >> at CC would have taken any avenue to give the "BY" >> part of the license more explicit boundaries; if >> jurisdictional universal interoperability requirements >> were easily swung that way. That they did >> not so find, should be a powerful signal to WMF, which >> after all has not really taken all that much trouble to >> research the matter. (There have been forceful assertions >> to the contrary, but they haven't yet demonstrated >> to have discovered persuasive arguments to any effect.) >> >> If the primary objective is to set Wikipedia at odds with a >> large segment of the world and its own contributors; >> saying "Attribute all our content to Wikipedia, or else!" >> ... "and let the devil take the hindmost editors." is a >> nice way to accomplish that, of course. >> >> Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
