Is this intended to imply that this full attribution must be on the same medium?
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com > wrote: > Full attributions are often the only guarantee of clear > ability to reuse. That is a fact. It would be arduous to > clarify where it might not be. I am satisfied the lawyers > at CC would have taken any avenue to give the "BY" > part of the license more explicit boundaries; if > jurisdictional universal interoperability requirements > were easily swung that way. That they did > not so find, should be a powerful signal to WMF, which > after all has not really taken all that much trouble to > research the matter. (There have been forceful assertions > to the contrary, but they haven't yet demonstrated > to have discovered persuasive arguments to any effect.) > > If the primary objective is to set Wikipedia at odds with a > large segment of the world and its own contributors; > saying "Attribute all our content to Wikipedia, or else!" > ... "and let the devil take the hindmost editors." is a > nice way to accomplish that, of course. > > > Yours, > > Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
