voyeurism isn't relevant to our culture? On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Emphasis on usefulness. We're about providing free content, and I would > hope being culturally significant would still be a priority. I always > considered > that a major point in inclusionism/deletionism debates. Are we remaining > culturally relevant? Talking about pop culture as well as historical events, > places, customs, etc. Providing information about naked people, their > habits, customs, fetishes even: I consider this culturally relevant. Hosting > a picture looking up a girl's skirt is hardly culture, and is borderline > voyeurism. > > If we're a dumping ground, of course none of this matters at all. > > -Chad > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
