That sounds more like an indictment of the organization of images, rather than the images themselves.
DM On 1/29/09, Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathosch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:50 PM, David Moran <fordmadoxfr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > "Commons is meant to be a collection of freely-licensed media, not a > dumping > > ground for all media that happens to be free." > > > > What's the difference? > > "Collection" implies some sort of useful organization and coherence, > with images added for their presumed usefulness. "Dumping ground" > implies a disorganized pile, with images added at random or without > regard to their presumed usefulness. > > -- > Yours cordially, > Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
