Hello world,
I just committed the fix for PR 11845 as obvious and simple, as
r15-7552-gfd00010ba21c04bddb20aef52f62de5636075067 .
Fix PR 118884, Lapack build failure.
The fix for PR 118845 introduced new checks, which in turn exposed
a case where the typespec information on a symbol generated symbol
was not set. This led to an apparent type of BT_UNKNOWN, and hence
an error. Fixed as obvious and simple, after regression-testing.
Best regards
Thomas
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* frontend-passes.cc (check_externals_procedure): Copy
typespec from old to new symbol.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/interface_54.f90: New test.diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
index 6b470b83e21..20bf6e127ff 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc
@@ -5727,6 +5727,7 @@ check_externals_procedure (gfc_symbol *sym, locus *loc,
gcc_assert (new_sym);
new_sym->attr = sym->attr;
new_sym->attr.if_source = IFSRC_DECL;
+ new_sym->ts = sym->ts;
gfc_current_ns = gsym->ns;
gfc_get_formal_from_actual_arglist (new_sym, actual);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_54.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_54.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..98318cae888
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_54.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR 118884 - this used to be rejected due to confused interface
+! checking.
+
+subroutine cget24
+ external cslect
+ logical cslect
+
+ call cgeesx(cslect)
+ if( cslect() ) print *,"foo"
+ call cgeesx(cslect)
+end subroutine cget24
