Dear all,

the check for potential aliasing of lhs and rhs currently shortcuts
if the types differ.  This is a problem if one is of type complex
and the other is of type real (and of the same kind parameter value),
as this ignores that F2008 inquiry references (%RE, %IM) could be
involved.  The attached patch just addresses this shortcut.

This may not be a complete solution, see discussion in the PR,
but is a lightweight solution (for the time being).

Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Harald

From c5029d09151292ec2ed1e878d49afc3480476588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 22:22:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: potential aliasing of complex pointer inquiry
 references [PR118120]

	PR fortran/118120

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	* trans-array.cc (symbols_could_alias): If one symbol refers to a
	complex type and the other to a real type of the same kind, do not
	a priori exclude the possibility of aliasing.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90: New test.
---
 gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc                    | 17 +++++++-----
 .../gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index 82a2ae1f747..52813857353 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -5344,15 +5344,20 @@ static bool
 symbols_could_alias (gfc_symbol *lsym, gfc_symbol *rsym, bool lsym_pointer,
 		     bool lsym_target, bool rsym_pointer, bool rsym_target)
 {
-  /* Aliasing isn't possible if the symbols have different base types.  */
-  if (gfc_compare_types (&lsym->ts, &rsym->ts) == 0)
-    return 0;
+  /* Aliasing isn't possible if the symbols have different base types,
+     except for complex types where an inquiry reference (%RE, %IM) could
+     alias with a real type with the same kind parameter.  */
+  if (!gfc_compare_types (&lsym->ts, &rsym->ts)
+      && !(((lsym->ts.type == BT_COMPLEX && rsym->ts.type == BT_REAL)
+	    || (lsym->ts.type == BT_REAL && rsym->ts.type == BT_COMPLEX))
+	   && lsym->ts.kind == rsym->ts.kind))
+    return false;

   /* Pointers can point to other pointers and target objects.  */

   if ((lsym_pointer && (rsym_pointer || rsym_target))
       || (rsym_pointer && (lsym_pointer || lsym_target)))
-    return 1;
+    return true;

   /* Special case: Argument association, cf. F90 12.4.1.6, F2003 12.4.1.7
      and F2008 12.5.2.13 items 3b and 4b. The pointer case (a) is already
@@ -5363,9 +5368,9 @@ symbols_could_alias (gfc_symbol *lsym, gfc_symbol *rsym, bool lsym_pointer,
 	  || (rsym->attr.dummy && !rsym->attr.contiguous
 	      && (!rsym->attr.dimension
 		  || rsym->as->type == AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE))))
-    return 1;
+    return true;

-  return 0;
+  return false;
 }


diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0ce4e6a8578
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aliasing_complex_pointer.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! PR fortran/118120 - potential aliasing of complex pointer inquiry references
+!
+! Contributed by Slava Zakharin < szakharin at nvidia dot com >
+
+program main
+  implicit none
+  integer :: k
+  complex, target :: data(21)
+  do k=1,21
+     data(k) = cmplx(-k,0.0)
+  end do
+  call test(1, 1, data)
+! print *, data
+  if (     data(1)      /= -1.)           stop 1
+  if (any (data(2:)% re /= [(k,k=1,20)])) stop 2
+contains
+  subroutine test(i, j, data)
+    integer :: i, j
+    complex, target  :: data(21)
+    real, pointer    :: result(:,:,:,:)
+    complex, pointer :: temp(:,:)
+    result(i:i,j:j,1:4,1:5) => data(2:)%re
+    temp(1:4,1:5)           => data(1:20)
+    result(i,j,:,:) = abs(temp)
+  end subroutine test
+end program main
--
2.35.3

Reply via email to