> Likely GFC_INTEGER_8 or int64_t or compatible. We have 32/64bit and > -fdefault-integer-8 to deal with…
That’s why I am suggesting either “int” or “size_t”, i.e., a well-defined C type. Means we don’t have to deal with -fdefault-integer. FX
> Likely GFC_INTEGER_8 or int64_t or compatible. We have 32/64bit and > -fdefault-integer-8 to deal with…
That’s why I am suggesting either “int” or “size_t”, i.e., a well-defined C type. Means we don’t have to deal with -fdefault-integer. FX