On Apr 6, 2023, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 29 For C_BOOL, the internal representation of .TRUE._C_BOOL and > .FALSE._C_BOOL shall be the same as those of > 30 the C values (_Bool)1 and (_Bool)0 respectively. I'm not changing any of the standard types, FWIW. The proposed extension enables alternate boolean types to be introduced, with extra checking for hardening. > I personally like your proposed 0 and ~0, that's probably pretty robust. That is only a default. Certain applications may benefit from other values. 0xa5 and 0x5a seem to make a good combination too. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
