On 19 January 2023 20:39:08 CET, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 4:24 PM Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches ><gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Am 12.11.22 um 22:05 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches: >> > This function definition was removed years ago, remove it's prototype. >> > >> > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: >> > >> > * gfortran.h (gfc_check_include): Remove declaration. >> > --- >> > gcc/fortran/gfortran.h | 1 - >> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> > --- >> > Regtests cleanly, ok for trunk? >> > >> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h >> > index c4deec0d5b8..ce3ad61bb52 100644 >> > --- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h >> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h >> > @@ -3208,7 +3208,6 @@ int gfc_at_eof (void); >> > int gfc_at_bol (void); >> > int gfc_at_eol (void); >> > void gfc_advance_line (void); >> > -int gfc_check_include (void); >> > int gfc_define_undef_line (void); >> > >> > int gfc_wide_is_printable (gfc_char_t); >> >> OK, thanks. > >Somehow this was applied with a CommitDate in 2021, breaking scripts >that assume monotonically increasing CommitDate. Anyone know how that >could have happened?
Sorry for that. I think i cherry-picked this commit to master before pushing it, not 100% sure though. What shall we do now?
