Hi Steve, yes, the extra macro did the job, so the testuite has run. So, this means the patch has to be adapted.
I will report the unexpectedly failing tests in a separate mail. Regards, Arjen Op ma 23 aug. 2021 om 19:18 schreef Steve Kargl < s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: > Hi Arjen, > > Don't know if you've made any progress with cygwin (yes, > I saw the other thread). I lurk on the J3 Fortran mailing > list, and have come to learn that C937 has been deleted in > the draft for Fortran 202x. What this means is that the > "gcc_error ()" statement will need to be changed to use > the "gfc_notify_std()" method reporting errors. > > -- > steve > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:59:05AM +0200, Arjen Markus wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > I am willing to take up this challenge ;), as well as the patch for C949. > > It would be my next attempt to get acquainted with the source code (a > first > > step hopefully to actively contribute). > > > > Regards, > > > > Arjen > > > > Op di 17 aug. 2021 om 21:02 schreef Steve Kargl via Fortran < > > fortran@gcc.gnu.org>: > > > > > For those that might care, I draw your attention to > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101951 > > > > > > Good opportunity for a lurker to step forward and > > > become a gfortran committer. Otherwise, this patch > > > will fester in bugzilla the dozen or so other patches > > > I've attached to PRs. > > > > > > -- > > > Steve > > > > > -- > Steve >
