https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
--- Comment #5 from Benson Muite <benson_mu...@emailplus.org> --- In this case consistent QA rules do not seem to be followed. Based on the standard, the Vendor ID should link to a vendor name, but this part of the standard does not seem to be followed. Perhaps MakeMusic would consider registering as a vendor if prompted? The foundry/vendor name is also used in the font rpm file name. This does help in distinguishing between different types of fonts, especially ones that are modified versions of existing fonts. Maybe the guidelines should be updated to clearly indicate that "Foundry" is the rights owning entity (manufacturer/creator/foundry). The example spec file indicates: # The identifier of the entity, that released the font family. %global foundry Perhaps this should be updated to %global vendor or at least clearly documented as vendor. Thus, your use of MakeMusic seems reasonable, though it would be good to check with them if they are ok with this and if they can register and fix the VendorID. otfinfo seems useful, though in Fedora, LCDF software is bundled as https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/texlive-base/texlive-lcdftypetools/ though likely should be its own repo as it is released separately: https://github.com/kohler/lcdf-typetools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
