https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> --- So the foundry name should be the same as the Vendor ID? It sure would be nice if https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/ would say so if that is the case. All it says is that %foundry should be: "an optional upstream identifier, when upstream publishes multiple font families, with consistent QA rules. Font families released by the same upstream will usually play well with one another. Marking them as such helps users choose good font package sets." Since it is optional, maybe I should omit it altogether? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
