On 12/18/12 2:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The RC does not contain the full mustella suite (not very useful to most
>> folks) so you need to be able to redirect a branch's mustella run against an
>> external set of SWCs and compiler.
>
> Perhaps the way to look at this is what would a user of the SDK expect?
>
> Currently we are not packaging up the mustella tests with the release
> packages, this means that there's likely only a small window of time where all
> the mustella tests will work with the released package (due to ongoing changes
> to the tests).
Really, the existing tests should not be changing. New tests should be
added, but we might find a clever way to manage them so don't run tests that
don't have features in a particular release.
>
> How important is it for user of the SDK to be able to run the mustalla tests?
> If it not important then all that matters is that we can test a RC with some
> confidence and it doesn't matter what location those test are in. If it is
> important we should package the tests are part of the release (preferable in a
> separate zip IMO).
>
I think it is the former. Most folks who are not approving an RC probably
don't need to run mustella.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
