On 11/30/12 11:05 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>:
> 
>> I don't object to generating a data structure for V11, but I think
>> that it makes more sense to do that as a second phase after ABC
>> generation is working. Otherwise there are a lot of moving parts and
>> progress will be slower.
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong Alex, but Gordon, I think Alex was talking
> about JavaScript data structures produced during crosscompile of MXML.
No, for both AS and JS so we have the same code paths.  But fear not, the
the work I did last year has a switch and all the old code paths are
retained.

I accept Gordon's argument that we can finish MXML handling faster by
getting Falcon to generate the old code patterns.
> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to