Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>:

I don't object to generating a data structure for V11, but I think that it makes more sense to do that as a second phase after ABC generation is working. Otherwise there are a lot of moving parts and progress will be slower.

Correct me if I'm wrong Alex, but Gordon, I think Alex was talking about JavaScript data structures produced during crosscompile of MXML.

In Alex's new component prototype he is using descriptor object that translate MXML tags to a JS Array; IE

override public function get uiDescriptors():Array
{
        return [
                Label,
                null,
                "lbl",
                2,
                "x", 100,
                "y", 25,
                0,
                1
}


Mike


- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:54 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FlaconJS] pseudo emitter algorithm

Before I do much more work on Falcon's MXML, we need to decide whether we're completing MXML->ABC or discarding that work.

- Gordon


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:46 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FlaconJS] pseudo emitter algorithm




On 11/30/12 10:33 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:


My point is, we would create a .js generator for MXML dialect. It
"might" even be adeventagious for us to create this implementation
becasue we "could" treat some parts of MXML differently than a plain
ole ActionScript class.

Yup, but keep in mind that I'm planning to check in code where MXML generates mostly a data structure, and very little code.


--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui



--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com

Reply via email to