OK, let's wait until next week and see if others agree that just having
different versions of airglobal.swc available from Adobe would be
sufficient.  It is all you may need to compile a simple swf, but to produce
final release packages, I think there are other pieces of the AIR SDK that
you need.  Maybe the FlexMojos testsuite doesn't cover release packaging of
AIR apps?


On 11/23/12 4:45 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> Well my Mavenizer doesn't deploy any air stuff besides the airglobal.swc and
> in the Flexmojos Testsuite there are tests for the different Air features and
> I am not having any trouble with that.
> The only thing is that I do have to provide the same third party libs the Flex
> SDK needs to have provided. So if you are talking about these libs, you might
> be correct. 
> But It would already be a great improvement to be able to build Flex
> applications without manual intervention.
> I have to admit that I have never ever done any Air yet nor any of the Flex
> guys around here that I have worked with.
> 
> Don't get me wrong. I'm not claiming that Nobody uses Air ... it's just that
> for those not using it this would be a great improvement.
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 17:26
> An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/21/12 11:59 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> 
>> Buuuuuut ... thinking of it :-)
>> 
>> Mabe it would indeed be better to start with Falcon as this is
>> definitely the future of Flex and Flexmojos already lets you build
>> using MXMLC ... And I always wanted to start digging into it, but
>> never actually found a usecase for it.
>> 
>> @Alex: Perhaps if Adobe were to publish the playerglobal and the
>> airglobal (Don't need the runtime ... think mavenizing the Runtim is
>> too much ... would simply use the runtimes from PATH).
>> Without those TWO artifacts the final solution would always be
>> half-baked (No matter what compiler) as no user could: "simply add the
>> plugin and start coding flex" :-) So what do you think? You make the
>> one thing happen, and I'll do the second?
>> ;-)
>> 
> I need convincing that this will work for captive runtime for mobile apps, and
> not sure how you are supposed to get the other executables that help make up
> the AIR package.
> 
> But if you want to try prototyping it, feel free.  I wll try to find time to
> help next week, if you need help.  I want to make sure it will work before we
> go ask for approvals.
> 
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to