On 11/21/12 12:24 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> 
> Well I was thinking on implementing this for mxmlc compilers first in order to
> have a fully functional plugin and then to add support for falcon as soon as
> it supports 100% of flex (Or am I wrong in the assumption that Falcon is not
> yet being a 100% replacement?). If Falcon is going to be finished soon,
> perhaps going the Falcon way might even be the better solution. Especially
> because of me being able to get real support from you ;-)
> 
> Chris
Well, we have a bunches of patches, fixed bugs and some new locales that I
think we should release soon, and I don't see us getting Falcon ready in
that timeframe.

However, I will be spending as much time as I can on Falcon otherwise, and
Gordon knows the Falcon code better than MXMLC.  And I think you'll find the
code easier to work with.

So if you want to get the basics of your work done for this next release (it
might not happen until late December or January) via MXMLC that's fine, but
I would definitely recommend saving optimization work for Falcon.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to